It seems like a common sense, life-saving proposal: U.S. Senators Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) want state motor-vehicle agencies to require completion of automakers' safety-recall repairs before issuing license plates.

Their justification, of course, is safety. But on a closer look, the bill is just a sop to the auto industry. Its biggest effect will be to hurt working people.

Pop quiz: Of the top three causes of auto accidents, where does "failure to get recall items fixed" rank?

Answer: It doesn't.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (no, auto accidents aren't a disease, but neither is "gun violence"; take it up with CDC), the top three causes of car-wreck injuries are distracted driving, speeding, and drunk driving. The vast majority of accidents are caused by driver error (often due to driver stupidity). Mechanical failure of any kind, let alone due to unrepaired recall items, doesn't make the list.

The auto industry's lobbyists indicate cautious support for the Markey/Blumenthal proposal. (They're awaiting details.) Why? Because it covers their bottom lines. If they've sent recall notices out, they can deny liability in accidents occurring after the covered cars next get licensed. Good for them, I guess.

But bad for those of us who drive "beaters" - older, cheaper cars such as my wife's 1989 Volvo.

Many drivers can't afford to buy cars new off the lot or make mid-three-digit monthly payments on fairly recent models. They take their chances on older, cheaper vehicles because they live paycheck to paycheck.

Yes, the costs of recall repairs are theoretically covered. If you live within reasonable distance of a dealership. If you can afford to do without your car for a while. If you can get off work for multiple trips to the DMV.

Those may not be problems for upper-middle-class drivers with late-model cars, bought from dealerships that make loaner cars available to valued customers.

But for the working poor, the policy may mean missing work hours required to make rent. It might even mean losing a job. Not for lack of safe transportation, but for an inability to satisfy politicians' desire to "get something done" (and be seen doing so).

If Markey and Blumenthal really want to use federal power to enhance highway safety, here are two suggestions.

First, forbid the states from requiring license plates for driving on federally funded highways. (They'd likely follow suit to state roads on their own.) Let insurance companies handle safety requirements and inspections. They don't like paying off accident claims. Their safety and inspection requirements might be even more stringent than government's.

Second, stop forcing automakers to install features that aren't ready for prime time. (The most well-known recall at the moment concerns airbags, which should be optional but which federal law requires.) Automakers, insurers, and drivers are more competent to decide than politicians and bureaucrats.

Absent those steps, let's at least put the brakes on Markey's and Blumenthal's very bad idea.

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (

Support the River Cities' Reader

Help Keep the Reader Alive and Free Since '93!


"We're the River Cities' Reader, and we've kept the Quad Cities' only independently owned newspaper alive and free since 1993. Now we find our ability to continue providing all the features you love in serious jeopardy without the financial support of our readers.

So please help the Reader keep going with your one-time, monthly, or annual support. With your financial support the Reader can continue providing uncensored, non-scripted, and independent journalism alongside the Quad Cities' area's most comprehensive cultural coverage." - Todd McGreevy, Publisher